‘Murders at Hollings General’ is FREE for Amazon Kindle this weekend

Kindle e-book readers can download Jerry Labriola’s 1999 top seller “Murders at Hollings Generalfor free this weekend from Amazon. The publisher, Strong Books, announces this special promotion for Friday, May 4th through Tuesday, May 8th for the 5-day weekend.  Visit Amazon.com

Murders at Hollings General is a medical murder mystery involving a series of bizarre homicides at a major teaching hospital in New England. The first murder takes place in the opening scene in the Operating Room, in full view of staff members. Readers are absolutely captivated by this story’s opening scene. This is the first of three novels that feature Dr. David Brooks, the engaging if somewhat quirky doctor/amateur sleuth.

Strong Books has published six of Jerry’s fiction novels for Kindle Amazon. One murder mystery and three of the true crime books that Jerry co-wrote with renowned forensic scientist Dr. Henry Lee has been published by Prometheus Books.

Posted in Author Comments | Leave a comment

Midwest Book Review Posts review for ‘Object of Betrayal’

Midwest Book Review has posted this review at their website for April 2012 for Object of Betrayal in the The Mystery/Suspense Shelf section.  see review

Our secrets are hidden in layers and layers behind everything. “Object of Betrayal” follows former Navy man Matt Doyle as his attempts to become a writer are derailed by the deep corruption of the mob and the death that follows. As the plot expands to include a monastery, a burned inn, and a chance at love, truth will turn stranger than fiction. “Object of Betrayal” is a fun and fast paced read that should prove hard to put down.

 

Posted in Author Comments | 1 Comment

Cruise Ship Talks – April 2012

As described by the SilverSea website, I will be cruising on the Silver Sprit in April.  Here are the topics that I will discuss.  see SilverSea

(1) Why People Are Fascinated with Murderers, Murder Mysteries, and Forensic Science. In addition, the history of the mystery genre; reasons people resort to murder; and a discussion of five main categories of murderers: the hardened killer; the terrible triad of mass murderer, serial killer, spree killer; psychotic killers; and psychopathic killers.

(2) The O. J. Simpson Case. In addition, a discussion of the accuracy of fingerprint identification; the accuracy of DNA analysis; what is DNA and the human genome all about?; has DNA analysis changed people’s opinion about the death penalty?; and an in-depth look at the nature of forensic science.

(3) The Assassination of JFK. In addition, a discussion of famous assassinations throughout history; causes and manners of death; how time of death is determined; environmental deaths; and the best definition of forensic science along with its origins.

(4) The JonBenet Ramsey and Vincent Foster Cases. In addition, a discussion of circumstantial evidence; consciousness of guilt; the charge of murder 50 years old; criminal clearance rates in the U.S.; and crimes in convenience stores.

(5) The Charles Lindbergh Case: The Kidnapping and Murder of an International Hero’s Baby. In addition, a discussion of the latest in stem cell research; the CSI effect; the effect of blood transfusions on blood typing and DNA ; and the effect of extreme heat on genetic materials.

(6) The Sam Sheppard Case (“Fugitive Series”) and the Jack the Ripper Case. In addition, a discussion of robotics and silicon brains; brain fingerprinting; writs of habeas corpus; optical scanning for fingerprints; smudge versus crisp prints; and restorative justice.

I hope you enjoy your next read. — Jerry

Posted in Author Comments | Leave a comment

The Mystery Reader

I have lectured about the makeup of the mystery novel.  So now it is time for me to discuss more about the mystery reader. What are the elements of the mystery that fascinates the reader?

I like to think that the mystery reader is the Law Enforcer, Prosecuting Attorney, Judge and Jury. They are presented with some of the facts, but they think ahead to figure out who the murderer is.

Let me digress for just a moment. I said “murder” because that is the ultimate crime. It gets the highest form of punishment.

Mystery readers like a puzzle. They like to arrange the pieces of the novel to see what fits. I liken this to Johnny Cochran’s famous phrase, “If it doesn’t fit, you must acquit”. The pieces of the mystery novel will contain distraction evidence as well as solid evidence. There should be motive, opportunity and means, and suspects must have these elements, so they can be added to the reader’s overall suspect list. A good complex story will have a “mountain of evidence” as mentioned by Prosecutor Marcia Clark, so the reader can sort this all out.

I think an interesting mystery novel idea could lead the reader to the number one suspect and show that suspect tried and convicted. But also the writer might show a large amount of neglected or discarded evidence. I see the Robert Frost scenario of “the road not taken” revealed in a follow-up “Part 2” or “Second Volume”. This could revolve around the convicted person’s appeal and might deal with evidence that was left on a dusty path that eventually leads him/her to a previously ignored suspect. In this instance, the reader may have fallen into a guilty trap as the new puzzle pieces are added to the mix. Can the mystery reader come to grips with the innocence of that first suspect?

There is so much more to tell about the mystery reader. In talks, I have discussed exotic scenes, memorable characters, forensics, sequence of events and the evidence that the mystery reader has forgotten that was left on the trail. How does the novel start if the crime does not take place right away? And certainly there will be action in the story.

I hope you enjoy your next read. — Jerry

Posted in Author Comments | 2 Comments

Next up “Object of Betrayal”

Object of BetrayalI’ve got great plans for the coming months. My new talks will help introduce the April debut of my next novel, Object of Betrayal. The story concerns the disappearance of a manuscript that its author Matt Doyle, feels is more than an act of piracy, for the subject matter deals with the heart and soul of a storied marriage cut short by his wife’s death. Matt thus tackles the crime with a ferocity that threatens his very existence. In the process he must go head-to-head with elements of organized crime as well as with other unlikely forces.  – Jerry

 

Posted in Author Comments | Leave a comment

The Ripper Report

Why The Story of Jack the Ripper is So Popular?

The time: a nine-week period in the fall of 1888, sometimes referred to as “The Autumn of Terror”.

The place: the Whitechapel district of London. That was the east end. Where the slums were. Where prostitutes flourished.

Jack the Ripper: Few names in history are as instantly recognizable. Fewer still, evoke such vivid images: noisy courts and alleys, cabs and gaslights, swirling fog, prostitutes decked out in the tawdriest of finery, the shrill cry of newsboys—and silent, cruel death personified in the cape-shrouded figure of a faceless prowler of the night, armed with a long knife and carrying a Gladstone bag.

And his identity is still unknown—although there’s hardly a year in the 123 since, when a new brainstorm doesn’t emerge. When experts don’t continue to speculate.

I won’t dwell on the many aspects of this saga—it would take up an entire book:
1. The homicides themselves, at least five, usually with terrible brutalization.
2. The victims, all female prostitutes, usually older, usually alcoholic.
3. The investigation—intense, prolonged.
4. The endless theories.
5. The abundance of graffiti.
6. The varied letters and postcards—some considered authentic (i.e., sent by   the killer) but most considered hoaxes.
7. The suspects: a mad doctor, a professional butcher, a deranged mid-wife, a mysterious lodger, even a member of royalty.

Actually, so much of The Ripper is mired in mystery and myth. And with the passage of time, much can get (1) exaggerated, (2) embellished upon, or (3) otherwise distorted. I have a simple way of viewing such things: The older a story, the more grains of salt it should be taken with.

But here goes. It’s not very long—quite short and concise, in fact. I’ll simply devote the next several minutes to why The Ripper continues to be discussed—throughout the world. To give you a sense of what it was all about. To scratch the surface, as it were.

I must emphasize, first and foremost, that Jack the Ripper created the myth, representing the evil ark-type of the more modern serial killer, like the ones I covered in an earlier lecture. This isn’t to say that the whole story is a myth—just that the story has been one of mythical proportions.

But by today’s standards of crime, Jack the Ripper would barely make international headlines. What? The murder of five prostitutes in a slum swarming with criminals?
Just one more violent creep satisfying his perverted needs? No, hardly anyone would be incensed over the fate of those five prostitutes as were the respectable families and friends of the pretty college students who were Ted Bundy’s victims. Unfortunately we’ve become a society numbed by horrible crimes inflicted upon many victims.

Why then, are there stories and songs and operas, and movies, and a never-ending stream of books on this one Victorian criminal?

Why are there many Ripperologists and no Bundyologists?

Why is the Ripper story as popular today as it was in Victorian London?

For two main reasons: First, because Jack the Ripper represents the classic whodunit. The story has a terrifying, almost supernatural quality. It’s been said that he came out of the fog, killed violenly by slashing a throat from ear to ear, and disappeared without a trace. And, after his last victim was found, he vanished from the face of the earth.

Yet, over time, much has been distorted and that brings us to the second reason for the continued fascination: mis-impression. As I stated before: exaggerated, embellished upon, and otherwise distorted over time.

In spite of their barbarism, the murders represent a real-life mystery from the era of Sherlock Holmes—the late 1880’s—the bygone, romantic era of high Victorian society, with gaslights and swirling London fog. But get this. Not one single killing took place on a foggy night! Not one single killing had any real relationship to Victorian splendor. And, of all possible coincidences, at the same time these murders were occurring, guess what was thrilling audiences across town at the Lyceum Theater, in the fashionable west end? The Strange Case of Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde.

Together, these two things—a classic whodunit and the Jekyl and Hyde coincidence—gave many people their first awareness of the potential for inherent evil in so-called normal individuals.

Finally, I’ll end this brief account with, first, no hint of who I think the killer was because I haven’t the slightest clue. And, second, with the unabashed claim that if modern forensic tools had been available back then, the mystery would have been easily cracked in short order. Even if the tools were confined to the barest essentials: DNA analysis, fingerprint analysis, and so on.

Just imagine, though—if that had been the case, we wouldn’t have such a lasting melodrama, would we?

And that’s my Ripper Report.

Posted in Author Comments | Tagged , | Leave a comment

James Bond, Special Agent 007

Until someone approached me recently and said there may be a new James Bond movie on the horizon—Skyfall—I hadn’t realized I’ve missed them so much. I’ve seen or read all the Bond movies and films at least once—like Casino Royale, Live and Let Die, From Russia With Love, Diamonds Are Forever, The Spy Who Loved Me. And I’m not alone. It’s said that half the world’s population has seen a Bond film and remembers that the suave hero “likes his martinis shaken, not stirred.”

Turns out that Ian Fleming’s 007 is one of my all-time favorite characters. Even his despicable villains and henchmen like Goldfinger, Dr. No, Hugo Max, and Brokenclaw continue to stand out in my mind. It’s amazing how much they, in Fleming’s classic mode, resemble the mobsters in the nearly dozen mystery/suspense novels I’ve authored. But, after all, a mystery is nothing more than a puzzle and a morality play wrapped into one. We’re clear on puzzles, but what’s a morality play? It involves the question of good versus evil which exactly reflects the James Bond story line.

The other day I got to thinking: Although I’m a novelist who sticks to the mystery/ suspense genre in his craft, for my own entertainment I prefer spy/adventure/ action novels, especially those featuring the exchange:

“And who may I say is calling?”
“Bond . . . James Bond.”


Here is a quick update on Skyfall

Posted in Author Comments | 1 Comment